Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40537213›Full record

ArticleNursing & health sciences2025

Nurses' Knowledge and Anxiety About Human Monkeypox Virus Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Yasemin Karacan, Rıdvan Bayram, Serkan Budak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasemin KaracanNursing Department, Internal Medicine Nursing, Yalova University Faculty of Health Sciences, Yalova, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8616-4935
Rıdvan BayramInternal Medicine Nursing, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Health Sciences, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1467-5255
Serkan BudakDepartment of Health Care Services, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Simav Vocational School of Health Services, Kütahya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6999-3528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the knowledge and anxiety levels of nurses in Türkiye regarding human monkeypox virus (Mpox) infection and explored related factors such as institutional training and preparedness. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2024 and January 2025 with 214 actively employed nurses. Data were collected using a socio-demographic questionnaire, a nurse introduction form, a form assessing thoughts about Mpox, a knowledge assessment form, and the Epidemic Anxiety Scale (EAS). The mean epidemic anxiety score was 48.36 ± 19.26, with significantly higher anxiety levels among female nurses. Greater Mpox knowledge was associated with higher job satisfaction, access to institutional information, and participation in training. Fear of infection, fear of transmitting the virus, and fear of losing loved ones significantly influenced knowledge levels. Each unit increase in perceived information adequacy was associated with a 6.56-point rise in knowledge scores. The findings reveal a substantial knowledge gap about Mpox among nurses in Türkiye, which may hinder outbreak preparedness. Strengthening educational initiatives and integrating epidemic management into nursing curricula are essential to improving nurses' readiness and protecting public health.

Indexed as

AnxietyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMpox, MonkeypoxNursesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonkeypox virusSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyanxietydisease outbreaksknowledgeMonkeypoxnurses

Identifiers

PMID40537213
PMCPMC12178774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.