ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2025
Cardiac Safety of Reduced Cardiotoxicity Surveillance During HER2-Targeted Therapy.
Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Thoracic Aortic Calcification-Based Nomogram for Early Myocardial Injury in Breast Cancer Patients.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Toxicity of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: Current Evidence and Evolving Considerations: JACC: CardioOncology Primer.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Review
- Time to Personalize Surveillance for Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction in HER2-Targeted Therapy: One Size Does Not Fit All.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- The year in cardiovascular medicine 2025: the top 10 papers in cardio-oncology.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Heart failure induced by cancer therapies: focus on targeted agents, mechanisms, risk prediction, and clinical management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Healthcare Management in Cardio-Oncology, Clinical Strategies and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Breaking the One-Size-Fits-All Approach in Cardio-Oncology: Applying the BEST to Optimize Cardiotoxicity Monitoring.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- A Cell Membrane-Coated Gold Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery System for Enhanced Antitumor Therapy in Breast Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- Advancing cardio-oncology: precision-guided cardiovascular care for oncology patients.Cardiology plusArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEchocardiograms are recommended every 3 months to monitor for cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) among patients treated with HER2-targeted therapy, despite increasing use of safer regimens associated with low CTRCD risk.
objectivesThis study evaluated the cardiac safety of reduced CTRCD surveillance performed every 6 months during non-anthracycline HER2-targeted treatment.
methodsThis non-randomized clinical trial enrolled 190 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with non-anthracycline HER2-targeted therapy. CTRCD surveillance by means of echocardiography was performed every 6 months. Key exclusion criteria were previous anthracycline exposure, significant cardiovascular disease, and uncontrolled hypertension. The primary outcome was the cardiac event rate, defined by heart failure or cardiovascular death at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included change in LVEF from baseline to 6 months and 1 year, incidence of asymptomatic CTRCD, incidence of HER2-targeted treatment interruption, and feasibility of reduced cardiac surveillance.
resultsThe median age was 52 years (Q1-Q3: 45-60 years); 174 (91.6%) had stage I-III disease, and all were treated with a trastuzumab-based regimen. Cardiovascular risk factors included hypertension (20.0%) and diabetes (4.2%), and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline was 63.6 ± SE 0.3%. There were 0 (0%; 1-sided 97.5% CI: 0%-1.9%) cardiac events with a median follow-up of 17.5 months (Q1-Q3: 16.3-18.9 months). One patient developed asymptomatic CTRCD (0.5%; 95% CI: 0.01%-2.9%) but resumed therapy after a temporary treatment interruption. Adherence to the reduced CTRCD surveillance schedule every 6 months was 73.2% (intention-to-treat) and 79.9% (per-protocol).
conclusionsReduced CTRCD surveillance every 6 months is safe and feasible for patients at low risk for CTRCD and may be an appropriate strategy to consider during non-anthracycline HER2-targeted treatment regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.