Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40537064›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2025

Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Intercostal Nerve Blocks in Uniportal Videoscopic-assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Multicenter, Double-blind, Prospective Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial.

Steve Coppens, Danny Feike Hoogma, Geertrui Dewinter, Arne Neyrinck, Philippe Van Loon, Björn Stessel, Jalil Hassanin, Jeroen Vandenbrande, Bert Du Pont, Yanina Jansen and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Erector spinae plane block.BJA education · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Intercostal nerve blockJournal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Steve CoppensDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6026-7757
Danny Feike HoogmaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9224-8198
Geertrui DewinterDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Arne NeyrinckDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Philippe Van LoonDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Björn StesselDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital Campus Virga Jesse, Hasselt, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universiteit Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jalil HassaninDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital Campus Virga Jesse, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jeroen VandenbrandeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital Campus Virga Jesse, Hasselt, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universiteit Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Bert Du PontDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jessa Hospital Campus Virga Jesse, Hasselt, Belgium.
Yanina JansenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8322-9841
Steffen FieuwsBiomedical Sciences Group, Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6875-8366
Steffen RexDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3536-9321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough intercostal nerve blocks are sometimes approached with caution due to concerns about potentially high local anesthetic uptake, they remain a valuable tool in specific clinical situations. On the other hand, the erector spinae plane block is currently often favored for its broader coverage and versatility. The hypothesis was that the intercostal nerve block, applied directly by surgeons under direct vision in patients undergoing uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, might offer superior analgesia and fewer complications compared to the erector spinae plane block.

methodsIn this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, 100 patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic surgery (wedge excision or lobectomy) within an enhanced recovery program received either a surgical intercostal nerve block under thoracoscopic guidance or an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block, followed by 30 ml ropivacaine 0.5% (n = 50) or saline (n = 50). The primary outcome measured was 12-h morphine consumption postextubation. Secondary outcomes included 24-h morphine use, pain severity, rescue analgesia need, postoperative complications, and length of stay. Plasma levels of local anesthetics were also assessed.

resultsThe intercostal nerve block group had significantly lower mean 12-h morphine consumption compared to the erector spinae plane block group (10.9 mg vs . 17.6 mg; P = 0.0015), as well as lower mean 24-h consumption (18.7 mg vs . 26.7 mg; P = 0.018). Intercostal blocks also led to lower pain scores in the first 2 h postoperatively and a reduced need for rescue analgesia (16% vs . 40%; P = 0.0033). No differences were found in patient satisfaction, complications, or length of stay. Notably, the erector spinae plane block group showed higher systemic absorption of local anesthetics.

conclusionsFor uniportal thoracoscopic surgery, intercostal nerve block significantly reduces morphine consumption and systemic anesthetic absorption compared to erector spinae plane block.

Indexed as

Intercostal NervesNerve BlockParaspinal MusclesThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAdultAgedAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainProspective StudiesUltrasonography, InterventionalAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.