ReviewCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
The Essential Nature of Social Work in Cancer Control.
Review in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unmet cancer rehabilitation needs and access to survivorship services across the cancer continuum.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Observational
- Health Insurance as a Mediator of Neighborhood Deprivation and Pediatric Cancer Survival: An Analysis of State Cancer Registry Data.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Identifying At-Risk Populations for Treatment Delays in Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma: A Nationally Representative Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Moving Toward Equity: Identifying and Mitigating Disparities in Cancer Care from Screening to Survival.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conditions in which people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age affect a range of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes, and contribute to social needs across the cancer control continuum. To address these needs, advance the quality of cancer care, and achieve health equity, cancer care clinicians must possess comprehensive knowledge and skills to mitigate the effects of social determinants of health on patient outcomes. This knowledge should also encompass an understanding of how racism, sexism, and discrimination - along with exposures to trauma - also influence patient behaviors and outcomes, given evidence of their effects on population health. For over 100 years, social workers have comprised an essential workforce that is duly educated and trained to identify social needs and improve patient outcomes within the context of health care service delivery, and cancer care in particular. Oriented to an ecological framework, social workers are adept at identifying and mitigating the negative effects of the social determinants of health on individual knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, with the intent of improving results for people at risk for or diagnosed with cancer. Social workers are professionally trained for organizing communities, understanding and intervening upon social systems (including families, organizations, and institutions), providing emotional support and mental health counseling, and advocating for programs and policies that best serve patients, families, and communities. Thus, social workers play a critical role in service delivery across the cancer control continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.