ReviewThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2025
A game of tag: A review of protein tags for the successful detection, purification and fluorescence labelling of proteins expressed in microalgae.
Review in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microalgae as novel drug-delivery system for biomedical field.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Toward a Vaccine Against Multidrug-Resistant Elizabethkingia anophelis: Comprehensive Immunoinformatics-Based Design of a Multi-Epitope Vaccine and mRNA Construct.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- A facile antibody-mediated CMC platform for targeted screening of CCR1 ligands fromJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Article
- UniTope & TraCR: A Universal Tool to Tag, Enrich, and Track TCR-T Cells and Therapeutic Proteins.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Beyond Purification: Evolving Roles of Fusion Tags in Biotechnology.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recombinant proteins play a crucial role in both fundamental research and biotechnology. In the laboratory, recombinant proteins are used in a myriad of ways, including to label cells, localize proteins and isolate complexes. In the clinic, antibody-based therapeutics can dramatically increase cancer survival rates, while virus-like particles (VLPs) are being developed as next-generation vaccines. These innovations have escalated demands for biopharmaceutical recombinant proteins. However, in traditional systems (e.g. mammalian and microbial) the expression of recombinant proteins can be prohibitively expensive. One sustainable, low-cost solution is to use a microalgal-based expression system, such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Chlorella sp., Haematococcus pluvialis or Nannochloropsis gaditana. Tools for microalgal protein expression are developing rapidly. Yet our understanding of recombinant protein expression and purification in microalgal systems lags that of traditional systems. Here, we review the impact of commonly used affinity and epitope tags (e.g. Polyhistidine-tag, Strep-tag II, HA-tag and FLAG-tag) on recombinant protein detection, purification and biofunctionality in microalgae. Additionally, we review fluorescent protein tags (such as GFP, mVenus, DsRed and mCherry) and protease cleavage sites, including 'self-cleaving' 2A peptides. Finally, we provide guidance on experimental design to enhance the likelihood of successfully expressing recombinant proteins in microalgae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.