ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Designing Chatbots to Treat Depression in Youth: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Therapeutic Interaction Features of AI Chatbots in Depression Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Large Language Model-Based Behavioral Activation Chatbot for Young People With Depression Using Artificial Users and Clinical Experts: Mixed Methods Evaluation.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Application and effectiveness of artificial intelligence in adolescent mental health support and therapy: a scoping review.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Platform shift in mental health support among undergraduates: from campus counselors to GenAI-based consultation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression is a severe and prevalent mental disorder among youth that requires professional care; however, various barriers hinder access to effective treatments. Chatbots, one of the latest innovations in the research on digital mental health interventions, have shown potential in addressing these barriers. However, most studies on how to design chatbots to treat depression have focused on adult populations or prevention in the general population. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the problems faced by youth with depression and their adaptive coping strategies, as well as attitudes, expectations, and design preferences for chatbots designed to treat depression. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study, consisting of a semistructured interview and a concurrent think-aloud session, in which participants interacted with a chatbot prototype with 14 youth with a current or remitted depressive episode. Results: The participants reported a wide range of problems beyond core depressive symptoms, such as interpersonal challenges, concerns about school and the future, and problems with human therapists. Adaptive coping strategies varied, with most seeking social support or engaging in pleasant activities. Attitudes toward chatbots for depression treatment were predominantly positive, with participants expressing less anxiety about using a chatbot than about seeing a human therapist. Participants showed diverse and partially contradictory design preferences, which included diverse dialogue topics, such as discussing daily life, acute problems, and therapeutic exercises, as well as various preferences for personality, language use, and personalization of the chatbot. Conclusions: Our study provides a comprehensive foundation for designing chatbots that meet the unique needs and design preferences of youth with depression. These findings can inform the design of engaging and effective chatbots tailored to this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.