Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40536907›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Community-informed and codesigned research to understand the impacts of railways on wildlife.

Kyle D Vincent, Jacqueline D Litzgus, Steven J Kell, Cory L Kozmik, Angela Belleau, Jesse N Popp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Community-informed and codesigned research to understand the impacts of railways on wildlife.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kyle D VincentSchool of Natural Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-1243-4014
Jacqueline D LitzgusSchool of Natural Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Steven J KellLands and Resource Department, Shawanaga First Nation, Nobel, Ontario, Canada.
Cory L KozmikDepartment of Lands and Resources, Magnetawan First Nation, Britt, Ontario, Canada.
Angela BelleauDepartment of Geography and Environment, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Jesse N PoppSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canada Research ChairsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Graduate Scholarship (OGS)The Laurentian University Advancing Indigenous Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trains cause mortalities of several animal species, but the ecological impacts of railways are understudied. Most research on wildlife-train collisions has focused on large mammals, but understanding railway-specific risks for underrepresented taxa, especially vulnerable species, is important for developing effective mitigation strategies. Based on the concerns and interests of 2 Anishinaabek communities-Shawanaga First Nation (SFN) and Magnetawan First Nation (MFN)-we collaboratively aimed to fill knowledge gaps with a community-informed approach in which Indigenous knowledge (IK) and Western science were used to investigate wildlife interactions with railways bisecting the 2 Traditional Territories in Ontario, Canada. To inform study design, First Nation community members were invited to share knowledge concerning wildlife-railway impacts in semistructured interviews. Weekly walking surveys were conducted in 3 field seasons along two 3.6-km sections of railway in SFN and MFN during which locations of all wildlife observed alive or dead were recorded. We also deployed game cameras at 500-m intervals along the railway survey areas. On walking surveys, we recorded 462 observations of individuals from 42 species, of which 76% were found dead. These findings complemented the shared IK that railways affect a wide variety of wildlife, often causing mortalities. Reptiles and amphibians were the most severely affected taxa, accounting for 87% of observed mortalities. Seven species at risk of extinction interacted with the railway, including 3 turtle species and one snake species, all of which were found dead on the railway tracks. Cameras recorded 43 wildlife species; most detections were of large and medium mammals, suggesting they frequently interact with the railway but may face lower mortality risks than herpetofauna in our study area. Ultimately, our study highlights the holistic outcomes that are possible through collaborative research that embraces complementary knowledge systems and indicates that reptile and amphibian populations may be particularly susceptible to railway mortality.

Indexed as

Animals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesRailroadsAnimalsOntarioamphibiansanfibiosconocimiento indígenaecología de vías férreasherpetofaunaIndigenous knowledgemortalidad ferroviariarailway ecologyrailway mortalityreptiles两栖动物两爬动物群土著知识爬行动物铁路生态学铁路致死率

Identifiers

PMID40536907
PMCPMC12451492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.