ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2025
Insights From Amniotic and Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Wound Healing.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights From Amniotic and Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Wound Healing.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- The effect and mechanism of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells on scar formation in rat uterine incision.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin repair is a complex physiological process that involves the coordinated actions of various cell types. This study examines the distinct roles of amniotic mesenchymal stem cells (A-MSCs) and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) in skin healing using a mouse model. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses revealed significant differences in gene expression between A-MSCs and UC-MSCs. Specifically, A-MSCs exhibited upregulation of genes associated with extracellular matrix (ECM) organisation and cell migration, thereby enhancing their tissue remodelling capabilities. In contrast, UC-MSCs demonstrate increased expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and anti-inflammatory responses, highlighting their role in creating a favourable healing environment. These findings highlight the unique therapeutic potentials of A-MSCs and UC-MSCs in skin repair strategies. Although MSCs hold promise in regenerative medicine, challenges such as optimal cell selection and modulation of the inflammatory microenvironment remain to be addressed. Our research emphasises the need for continued research related to properties of MSCs to refine therapeutic approaches for effective wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.