Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40536801›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Large Language Model Architectures in Health Care: Scoping Review of Research Perspectives.

Florian Leiser, Richard Guse, Ali Sunyaev

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Prompt Engineering in Clinical Practice: Tutorial for Clinicians.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Florian Leiser *Research Group Critical Information Infrastructures, Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5347-0493
Richard Guse *Research Group Critical Information Infrastructures, Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0033-8277
Ali SunyaevChair of Information Infrastructures, School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Campus Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4353-8519

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge language models (LLMs) can support health care professionals in their daily work, for example, when writing and filing reports or communicating diagnoses. With the rise of LLMs, current research investigates how LLMs could be applied in medical practice and their benefits for physicians in clinical workflows. However, most studies neglect the importance of selecting suitable LLM architectures.

objectiveIn this literature review, we aim to provide insights on the different LLM model architecture families (ie, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers [BERT]-based or generative pretrained transformer [GPT]-based models) used in previous research. We report on the suitability and benefits of different LLM model architecture families for various research foci.

methodsTo this end, we conduct a scoping review to identify which LLMs are used in health care. Our search included manuscripts from PubMed, arXiv, and medRxiv. We used open and selective coding to assess the 114 identified manuscripts regarding 11 dimensions related to usage and technical facets and the research focus of the manuscripts.

resultsWe identified 4 research foci that emerged previously in manuscripts, with LLM performance being the main focus. We found that GPT-based models are used for communicative purposes such as examination preparation or patient interaction. In contrast, BERT-based models are used for medical tasks such as knowledge discovery and model improvements.

conclusionsOur study suggests that GPT-based models are better suited for communicative purposes such as report generation or patient interaction. BERT-based models seem to be better suited for innovative applications such as classification or knowledge discovery. This could be due to the architectural differences where GPT processes language unidirectionally and BERT bidirectionally, allowing more in-depth understanding of the text. In addition, BERT-based models seem to allow more straightforward extensions of their models for domain-specific tasks that generally lead to better results. In summary, health care professionals should consider the benefits and differences of the LLM architecture families when selecting a suitable model for their intended purpose.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareLanguageModels, TheoreticalHumansLarge Language ModelsChatGPTdigital healthgenerative artificial intelligencelarge language modelsmedical informaticsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID40536801
PMCPMC12226782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.