ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2025
Deep learning detects retropharyngeal edema on MRI in patients with acute neck infections.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning for automatic detection of prostatectomy in CT images of prostate cancer patients.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Acute deep neck infection MRI: deep learning segmentation and clinical relevance of retropharyngeal edema volume.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn acute neck infections, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows retropharyngeal edema (RPE), which is a prognostic imaging biomarker for a severe course of illness. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based algorithm for the automated detection of RPE.
methodsWe developed a deep neural network consisting of two parts using axial T2-weighted water-only Dixon MRI images from 479 patients with acute neck infections annotated by radiologists at both slice and patient levels. First, a convolutional neural network (CNN) classified individual slices; second, an algorithm classified patients based on a stack of slices. Model performance was compared with the radiologists' assessment as a reference standard. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated. The proposed CNN was compared with InceptionV3, and the patient-level classification algorithm was compared with traditional machine learning models.
resultsOf the 479 patients, 244 (51%) were positive and 235 (49%) negative for RPE. Our model achieved accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of 94.6%, 83.3%, 96.2%, and 94.1% at the slice level, and 87.4%, 86.5%, 88.2%, and 94.8% at the patient level, respectively. The proposed CNN was faster than InceptionV3 but equally accurate. Our patient classification algorithm outperformed traditional machine learning models.
conclusionA deep learning model, based on weakly annotated data and computationally manageable training, achieved high accuracy for automatically detecting RPE on MRI in patients with acute neck infections. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our automated method for detecting relevant MRI findings was efficiently trained and might be easily deployed in practice to study clinical applicability. This approach might improve early detection of patients at high risk for a severe course of acute neck infections. KEY POINTS: Deep learning automatically detected retropharyngeal edema on MRI in acute neck infections. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 94.1% at the slice level and 94.8% at the patient level. The proposed convolutional neural network was lightweight and required only weakly annotated data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.