Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40536731›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2025

Deep learning detects retropharyngeal edema on MRI in patients with acute neck infections.

Oona Rainio, Heidi Huhtanen, Jari-Pekka Vierula, Janne Nurminen, Jaakko Heikkinen, Mikko Nyman, Riku Klén, Jussi Hirvonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oona RainioTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. ormrai@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-7656
Heidi HuhtanenDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1581-1709
Jari-Pekka VierulaDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5933-5421
Janne NurminenDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2482-9051
Jaakko HeikkinenDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8007-5090
Mikko NymanDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-6302
Riku KlénTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-8360
Jussi HirvonenTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0368-3746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn acute neck infections, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows retropharyngeal edema (RPE), which is a prognostic imaging biomarker for a severe course of illness. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based algorithm for the automated detection of RPE.

methodsWe developed a deep neural network consisting of two parts using axial T2-weighted water-only Dixon MRI images from 479 patients with acute neck infections annotated by radiologists at both slice and patient levels. First, a convolutional neural network (CNN) classified individual slices; second, an algorithm classified patients based on a stack of slices. Model performance was compared with the radiologists' assessment as a reference standard. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated. The proposed CNN was compared with InceptionV3, and the patient-level classification algorithm was compared with traditional machine learning models.

resultsOf the 479 patients, 244 (51%) were positive and 235 (49%) negative for RPE. Our model achieved accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of 94.6%, 83.3%, 96.2%, and 94.1% at the slice level, and 87.4%, 86.5%, 88.2%, and 94.8% at the patient level, respectively. The proposed CNN was faster than InceptionV3 but equally accurate. Our patient classification algorithm outperformed traditional machine learning models.

conclusionA deep learning model, based on weakly annotated data and computationally manageable training, achieved high accuracy for automatically detecting RPE on MRI in patients with acute neck infections. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our automated method for detecting relevant MRI findings was efficiently trained and might be easily deployed in practice to study clinical applicability. This approach might improve early detection of patients at high risk for a severe course of acute neck infections. KEY POINTS: Deep learning automatically detected retropharyngeal edema on MRI in acute neck infections. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 94.1% at the slice level and 94.8% at the patient level. The proposed convolutional neural network was lightweight and required only weakly annotated data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEdemaMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeckPharyngeal DiseasesAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceMagnetic resonance imagingNeural networks (computer)Respiratory tract infectionsRetropharyngeal abscess

Identifiers

PMID40536731
PMCPMC12179047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.