ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Concordance between single-slice abdominal computed tomography-based and bioelectrical impedance-based analysis of body composition in a prospective study.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-derived extracellular volume fraction and AI-assisted body composition for predicting neoadjuvant therapy response and prognosis in colorectal cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Type 2 Diabetes, Visceral Adiposity, and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Hospitalized Adults: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- CT-Assessed Body Composition as Predictor of Post-Operative Complications in Lung Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2026Review
- Association between handgrip strength and visceral obesity with low appendicular skeletal muscle mass in Chinese adults.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Integrated CT-based assessment of muscle and adiposity for risk stratification in advanced pancreatobiliary cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBody composition analysis (BCA) is a recognized indicator of patient frailty. Apart from the established bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), computed tomography (CT)-derived BCA is being increasingly explored. The aim of this prospective study was to directly compare BCA obtained from BIA and CT. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 210 consecutive patients scheduled for CT, including a high proportion of cancer patients, were prospectively enrolled. Immediately prior to the CT scan, all patients underwent BIA. CT-based BCA was performed using a single-slice AI tool for automated detection and segmentation at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). BIA-based parameters, body fat mass (BFM
resultsParameters representing fat, BFM
conclusionCT-based BCA strongly correlates with BIA results and yields quantitative results for BFP and SMI comparable to the existing gold standard. KEY POINTS: Question CT-based body composition analysis (BCA) is moving more and more into clinical focus, but validation against established methods is lacking. Findings Fully automated CT-based BCA correlates very strongly with guideline-accepted bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Clinical relevance BCA is currently moving further into clinical focus to improve assessment of patient frailty and individualize therapies accordingly. Comparability with established BIA strengthens the value of CT-based BCA and supports its translation into clinical routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.