ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2025
The Role of the Negated Information in Processing Negation: A Visual World Study.
Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper reports the results of a visual world study that explored the processing of sentential negation by Italian adults. To fulfill this aim, we assessed the perceptual prominence of the negated information (that is, the propositional content in the scope of negation). Specifically, we employed an identification task in a visual world set-up in which participants had to listen to affirmative and negative sentences (e.g., Aladdin [is/is not] closing the door…) while looking at visual scenes with the number of pictures matching the negated content varying from one to three. Negation processing was investigated across different propositional and perceptual dimensions by including three types of items (cartoons, black and white, and coloured shapes). We found that i) participants were always slower in target identification with negative sentences vs. their affirmative counterparts; ii) the perceptual prominence of the negated information reduced this processing penalty. These results support the idea that the representation of the negated information plays an active role in negative sentence comprehension, in compliance with two-step-based accounts of negation processing. Nonetheless, the computation of sentential negation displays some degree of flexibility and is in part modulated by the visual and linguistic information provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40536696What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.