Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40536667›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Development and characterization of angiotensin I certified reference materials.

Fanyu Deng, Ruiqi Wang, Kaifa Liu, Liqing Wu, Rui Su, Yahui Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fanyu DengNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Ruiqi WangNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Kaifa LiuNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Liqing WuNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Rui SuNorth University of China, Taiyuan, 030051, Shanxi, China. surui@nuc.edu.cn.
Yahui LiuNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China. liuyahui@nim.ac.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFF0701903the quality and basic ability construction project of National Institute of Metrology, China ANL2202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiotensin I (ANGI) plays an important role in regulating blood pressure and maintaining homeostasis; the accurate analysis of its levels is beneficial in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Despite the existence of several detection techniques for ANGI, a "yardstick" to evaluate the results of different detection techniques is still lacking. To ensure the reliability of ANGI tests along with the accuracy and comparability of the analytical results, natural and isotope-labeled ANGI certified reference materials were characterized, and their purities were assessed by mass balance and quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance methods. The moisture content of the samples was determined using the Karl Fischer method, anion content was measured via ion chromatography, and inorganic elements were detected via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. In the quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance method, maleic acid was used as a quantitative internal standard, and the final values of natural and isotope-labeled ANGI were determined on the basis of their quantitative peaks. The final purity was verified by isotope dilution mass spectrometry. The natural and labeled ANGI purities were (0.8511 ± 0.041) g/g and (0.8696 ± 0.042) g/g, respectively. Furthermore, the abundance of double-labeled ANGI-which refers to the labeling rate of

Indexed as

Angiotensin ICarbon IsotopesHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMass SpectrometryNitrogen IsotopesReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsAngiotensin ICarbon IsotopesNitrogen IsotopesAbundance determinationAngiotensin IIsotope dilution mass spectrometryMass balance methodQuantitative nuclear magnetic resonanceUncertainty assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.