ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Development and characterization of angiotensin I certified reference materials.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Angiotensin I (ANGI) plays an important role in regulating blood pressure and maintaining homeostasis; the accurate analysis of its levels is beneficial in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Despite the existence of several detection techniques for ANGI, a "yardstick" to evaluate the results of different detection techniques is still lacking. To ensure the reliability of ANGI tests along with the accuracy and comparability of the analytical results, natural and isotope-labeled ANGI certified reference materials were characterized, and their purities were assessed by mass balance and quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance methods. The moisture content of the samples was determined using the Karl Fischer method, anion content was measured via ion chromatography, and inorganic elements were detected via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. In the quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance method, maleic acid was used as a quantitative internal standard, and the final values of natural and isotope-labeled ANGI were determined on the basis of their quantitative peaks. The final purity was verified by isotope dilution mass spectrometry. The natural and labeled ANGI purities were (0.8511 ± 0.041) g/g and (0.8696 ± 0.042) g/g, respectively. Furthermore, the abundance of double-labeled ANGI-which refers to the labeling rate of
Indexed as
Identifiers
40536667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.