Observational studyJournal of ultrasound2025
Evaluating the technical experience of transmuscular quadratus lumborum block in prone position: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditionally quadratus lumborum block has been performed in lateral or supine positions. We propose that transmuscular or anterior quadratus lumborum block performed in a prone position may offer comparable or improved technical conditions, image quality and also aid in resident training. This study aimed to assess the technical ease of performing Tm-QLB in the prone position.
methodsThis retrospective study included female patients undergoing elective gynecologic oncology surgery via midline incision, who received bilateral preoperative prone-position transmuscular quadratus lumborum block. Block performance was evaluated using a composite score derived from normalized ultrasound image quality, time taken, number of attempts, and redirections. Blocks were categorized into five difficulty levels based on the composite score.
resultsNinety blocks were analyzed. Mean age was 40.18 ± 12.05 years; BMI was 23.90 ± 1.86 kg/m
conclusionProne-position Tm-QLB is technically easy and operator-friendly, making it a viable alternative for training and clinical practice in suitable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.