ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Long-term clinical outcomes of bevacizumab for treatment of stereotactic radiosurgery-induced radiation necrosis in patients with brain metastases.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epilepsy in Patients with Cerebral Radiation Necrosis: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Advances in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced brain necrosis: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRadiation necrosis (RN) is a potentially debilitating complication of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BrM). Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor A, is increasingly used for treating symptomatic RN. This multi-institutional retrospective study examines its longitudinal efficacy, toxicity, and steroid-sparing effect in BrM patients with SRS-induced RN over an extended follow-up.
methodsBrM patients from two Australian health networks who received bevacizumab between 2018 and 2023 for SRS-induced RN were identified. Patient characteristics, symptomatic and radiological responses, steroid use, and toxicities were recorded. Time-to-events and associations with outcomes were analysed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods.
results26 patients were analysed over a median follow-up of 21.2 months. The most common bevacizumab schedule was 7.5 mg/kg 3-weekly for a median of 3 cycles. Symptomatic responses were detectable 1-week post-commencement, improving headache and neurological deficits in 60% and 80% of patients by 6 months. 88% had radiological improvement by a median of 7 weeks. 71% of those on steroids could cease steroids over a median of 1.9 month. 19% developed recurrent, symptomatic RN 9.5-28.5 months after bevacizumab cessation. 75% of those re-treated with bevacizumab for recurrent RN gained further symptomatic improvement. Grade 2 + toxicity rate was 24% (venous thromboembolism: 12%; hypertension: 8%; intra-tumoural haemorrhage: 4%).
conclusionBevacizumab is an effective treatment for symptomatic, steroid-dependent SRS-induced RN but is associated with moderate rates of Grade 2-3 toxicities and recurrent, symptomatic RN after its cessation. Bevacizumab rechallenge remains useful for recurrent RN. Multi-disciplinary input and careful surveillance remain critical for its use in BrM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40536632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.