ArticleAnnals of intensive care2025
Attenuation of the plasma volume response to crystalloid fluid used for goal-directed fluid therapy.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of oral water ingestion and intravenous fluid infusion on fluid responsiveness in healthy volunteers, a prospective, randomized trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Revisiting the fluid challenge and stroke volume optimisation after induction of general anaesthesia.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Perioperative fluid therapy in adults and children: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGoal-directed fluid therapy uses repeated bolus infusions of crystalloid or colloid fluid to increase the plasma volume for the purpose of challenging the patient's position on the Frank-Starling curve. Each bolus is assumed to increase cardiac preload to the same degree. We examined whether this view is reasonable by simulating the plasma volume responses to crystalloid and colloid fluid. For this purpose, the volume kinetics of crystalloid fluid was characterized in 103 anaesthetized patients while parameters for colloid (hydroxyethyl starch) were taken from the literature. Simulations focused on the plasma volume response to 3 bolus infusions of 4 mL/kg of crystalloid and 2-4 mL/kg of colloid over 7 min. The boluses were separated by a free interval of 5 min to allow hemodynamic assessment.
resultsCrystalloid fluid showed attenuation of the plasma volume response to repeated bolus infusions. The second and third bolus increased the plasma volume by only 51 and 36% as much as the first one. Attenuation also occurred when the boluses were preceded by a constant-rate infusion of 5 mL/kg/h or 10 mL/kg/h of crystalloid over 60 min, while placing the patient in the Trendelenburg body position (head down) reduced the attenuation. Bleeding increased the plasma volume responses, but attenuation still occurred. Colloid fluid did not show attenuation.
conclusionAttenuation of the plasma volume response to bolus infusions of crystalloid fluid occurs. The second and third bolus might not increase cardiac preload enough to allow a correct diagnosis of fluid responsiveness. This problem is not shared by colloid fluid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.