Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40536606›Full record

ArticleCarbon balance and management2025

Nitrogen addition enhances soil carbon and nutrient dynamics in Chinese croplands: a machine learning and nationwide synthesis.

Yu Li, Yuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carbon balance and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu LiQuality Foundation Development Institute of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, 831399, China.
Yuan LiInstitute of Soil, Fertilizer and Water Saving Agriculture, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, 830091, China. yuan1028li@163.com.

Funding

Xinjiang Forestry and Grassland Administration XJLCKJ-2025-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) addition is a critical driver of soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and nutrient cycling in croplands. However, its spatial variability and long-term effects under diverse environmental conditions remain poorly understood. We synthesised data from 479 cropland sites across China and apply machine learning models to evaluate the impacts of N addition on SOC and key soil nutrient indicators, including total nitrogen (TN), nitrate (NO₃⁻-N), ammonium (NH₄⁺-N), the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C/N), and available phosphorus (AP). We further evaluated the moderating roles of climate zones, fertiliser types, and fertilisation duration. Our findings demonstrate that N addition significantly increased SOC, TN, NO₃⁻-N, NH₄⁺-N, and AP contents, whereas the C/N ratio remains unaffected. SOC sequestration was greater in arid regions, whereas nutrient accumulation was more pronounced in humid zones. Organic and integrated (organic-inorganic) fertilisers outperformed chemical ones in enhancing SOC and nutrient cycling. Long-term N input (> 10 years) markedly intensified SOC storage and nutrient accumulation. We further developed the high-resolution (5 km) national-scale dataset that predicts the spatial responses of SOC and nutrient dynamics to nitrogen addition across China. This AI-derived dataset enables automated mapping of soil carbon and nutrient functions, capturing substantial spatial heterogeneity under varying environmental conditions. These results provide critical insights for optimising nitrogen management strategies, enhancing soil carbon sink functions, and informing precision agriculture policies in China.

Indexed as

Carbon sequestrationChinaMachine learningNitrogen additionNutrient cyclingSoil organic carbon

Identifiers

PMID40536606
PMCPMC12177997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.