ArticleCarbon balance and management2025
Nitrogen addition enhances soil carbon and nutrient dynamics in Chinese croplands: a machine learning and nationwide synthesis.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonlinear temperature change responses shape soil organic carbon loss-gain transitions in global Mollisol croplands.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Long-Term Active Rather than Passive Restoration Promotes Soil Organic Carbon Accumulation by Alleviating Microbial Nitrogen Limitation in an Extremely Degraded Alpine Grassland.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in soil microbiome-driven agriculture: from practical limits to a translational roadmap.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Review
- Nitrogen addition has negative effects on bacterial diversity and stability, but simulated grazing mitigates these effects.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Blending sludge alkaline hydrolysate and urea affects grape yield and quality by regulating soil bacterial communities.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) addition is a critical driver of soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and nutrient cycling in croplands. However, its spatial variability and long-term effects under diverse environmental conditions remain poorly understood. We synthesised data from 479 cropland sites across China and apply machine learning models to evaluate the impacts of N addition on SOC and key soil nutrient indicators, including total nitrogen (TN), nitrate (NO₃⁻-N), ammonium (NH₄⁺-N), the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C/N), and available phosphorus (AP). We further evaluated the moderating roles of climate zones, fertiliser types, and fertilisation duration. Our findings demonstrate that N addition significantly increased SOC, TN, NO₃⁻-N, NH₄⁺-N, and AP contents, whereas the C/N ratio remains unaffected. SOC sequestration was greater in arid regions, whereas nutrient accumulation was more pronounced in humid zones. Organic and integrated (organic-inorganic) fertilisers outperformed chemical ones in enhancing SOC and nutrient cycling. Long-term N input (> 10 years) markedly intensified SOC storage and nutrient accumulation. We further developed the high-resolution (5 km) national-scale dataset that predicts the spatial responses of SOC and nutrient dynamics to nitrogen addition across China. This AI-derived dataset enables automated mapping of soil carbon and nutrient functions, capturing substantial spatial heterogeneity under varying environmental conditions. These results provide critical insights for optimising nitrogen management strategies, enhancing soil carbon sink functions, and informing precision agriculture policies in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.