Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40536600›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2025

Updates in Metal Allergy: A Review of New Pathways of Sensitization, Exposure, and Treatment.

Joshua Bernstein, Levi Keller, Karin Pacheco

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua Bernstein *Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Levi Keller *Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Karin PachecoDivision of Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences, Department of Medicine National Jewish Health and University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA. pachecok@njhealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMetal exposures are widespread, and ensuing allergic sensitization leads to secondary disease processes, especially contact dermatitis, with chronic implications. This review covers recently described mechanisms of sensitization, sources of exposure, and treatment options. RECENT

findingsSensitization to metals is similar to other allergic processes: it is triggered by innate responses, which then facilitate allergic priming. Early oral exposures may lead to tolerance, whereas initial cutaneous exposures by piercings start the pathway toward sensitization. Nickel 'allergy' may be ubiquitous because of multiple pathways of immune response. Although the most frequent reaction to metals is a type IV immune response, some metals, including platinum and sometimes nickel, can also trigger a type I IgE mediated response. Current treatment involves avoidance of exposure and suppression of the response, although inducing tolerance by early oral exposure may be the best method to avoid disease. Better understanding of the factors and contacts that drive metal sensitization will enable better management of the types and timing of exposure, which then may instead induce tolerance and prevent disease.

Indexed as

AllergensDermatitis, Allergic ContactHypersensitivityMetalsAnimalsEnvironmental ExposureHumansImmune ToleranceNickelAllergensMetalsNickelAllergyInnate immunityMetal implants and biomedical devicesMetal sensitizationNickelPlatinumTolerance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.