ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Participation and co-creation in implementation research].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The development process of a regional dementia strategy: a Delphi study and deliberative dialogues.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of implementation research is to transfer evidence-based interventions from research into practice. Successful transfer requires acceptance of the interventions by users and implementers. Research processes are increasingly focussing on participatory approaches in which various stakeholders are involved in research and implementation, thereby increasing the acceptability of interventions. Depending on the intervention, participation may draw from users, research, care providers or policy and funding bodies. Citizens and patients play a crucial role in participatory processes. Participatory implementation research is a collaborative approach that combines implementation research with the co-creation of knowledge by systematically involving participants in the research process and beyond. In this way, user-centred, tailor-made, lifeworld-oriented interventions in health promotion and healthcare can be scientifically developed under real-life conditions and permanently transferred into real-world practice. This review article examines the status of participatory implementation research in Germany and outlines the concepts and framework of participatory implementation research. To this end, projects from the fields of patient care, health promotion and the community setting are described. Two examples of the long-term participation of citizens of a neighbourhood in research conducted in the urban district laboratories in Bochum and Hamburg show how continuous participation and co-creation in implementation research for prevention, health promotion and health care can succeed.An English full-text version of this article is available at SpingerLink as Supplementary Information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.