Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40536588›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[Participation and co-creation in implementation research].

Anja Zscheppang, Christiane Falge, Silke Betscher, Anna Köster-Eiserfunke, Jonas Fiedler, Claudia Czernik, Claudia Hoevener, Anna Kuehne

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anja ZscheppangProfessur Öffentliche Gesundheit, Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung (ZEGV), Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Christiane FalgeProfessur für Gesundheit und Diversity, Stadtteillabor Bochum, Hochschule Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland.
Silke BetscherProfessur für Gemeinwesenarbeit, Community Development und Macro Social Work Department Soziale Arbeit, HAW, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Anna Köster-EiserfunkeProfessur für Gemeinwesenarbeit, Community Development und Macro Social Work Department Soziale Arbeit, HAW, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Jonas FiedlerPoliklinik Veddel, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Claudia CzernikProfessur Öffentliche Gesundheit, Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung (ZEGV), Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Claudia HoevenerAlice Salomon Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences, Berlin, Deutschland.
Anna KuehneProfessur Öffentliche Gesundheit, Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung (ZEGV), Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. Oeffentliche.Gesundheit@tu-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of implementation research is to transfer evidence-based interventions from research into practice. Successful transfer requires acceptance of the interventions by users and implementers. Research processes are increasingly focussing on participatory approaches in which various stakeholders are involved in research and implementation, thereby increasing the acceptability of interventions. Depending on the intervention, participation may draw from users, research, care providers or policy and funding bodies. Citizens and patients play a crucial role in participatory processes. Participatory implementation research is a collaborative approach that combines implementation research with the co-creation of knowledge by systematically involving participants in the research process and beyond. In this way, user-centred, tailor-made, lifeworld-oriented interventions in health promotion and healthcare can be scientifically developed under real-life conditions and permanently transferred into real-world practice. This review article examines the status of participatory implementation research in Germany and outlines the concepts and framework of participatory implementation research. To this end, projects from the fields of patient care, health promotion and the community setting are described. Two examples of the long-term participation of citizens of a neighbourhood in research conducted in the urban district laboratories in Bochum and Hamburg show how continuous participation and co-creation in implementation research for prevention, health promotion and health care can succeed.An English full-text version of this article is available at SpingerLink as Supplementary Information.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity ParticipationEvidence-Based MedicineHealth PromotionPatient ParticipationTranslational Research, BiomedicalGermanyHumansCapacity buildingCommunity-based participatory researchEvidence-based practiceGermanyImplementation sciencePublic health

Identifiers

PMID40536588
PMCPMC12254173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.