ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Sex assessment from contemporary Mexican postcranial long bones.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The estimation of sex is crucial in forensic anthropology for human identification. Particularly in Mexico, there is a need for methods suitable for complex forensic contexts where skeletal elements are incomplete and/or fragmented. Based on this premise, research using bones from the postcranial skeleton have shown promising results, especially with long bone measurements of the extremities, which have proven to be reliable sex indicators.The aim of this study was to develop discriminant functions and cut-off points for variables evaluated in sex estimation for human identification in a forensic context. A total of 30 measurements were taken from the long bones of the extremities of 122 individuals (31% female and 69% male) from the skeletal collection housed at the Physical Anthropology Laboratory in the Anatomy department of the School of Medicine at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). Results indicate significant differences between females and males in all measurements. Cut-off points were established for each skeletal element and 10 discriminant functions were generated. The results showed correct classification percentages ranging from 63.5 to 91.9% with the cut-off points and from 73.1 to 91.4% with the discriminant functions. Therefore, we recommend these methods be used for sex estimation in diverse forensic contexts for human identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40536517What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.