ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025
A machine learning approach to predict hypertension using cross-sectional & two years follow up data from a health & demographic cohort of Assam, North East India.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives Hypertension affects a sizable section of the world population and is being recognised as a growing problem. Its prediction using machine learning (ML) algorithms, will add to its control and prevention. The objective of the present investigation was to check the applicability of ML approaches in the prediction and detection of hypertension. Methods We included 53,301 participants at baseline from a health and demographic surveillance system in Dibrugarh, Assam (Dibrugarh-HDSS). We constructed two models, one at baseline and the other after two years of follow-up. Of the total participants (baseline: 29,402; follow up: 4,400), 70 per cent were randomly selected to fit seven popular classification models namely decision tree classifier (DTC), random forest classifier (RFC), support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), logistic regression, Ada-boost classifier, and XG boost classifier. The data from the remaining 30 per cent were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Results In the baseline data, the Ada-boost classifier could identify hypertension with a maximum accuracy score of 87.02 per cent (CI: 86.01-88.03). The maximum area under the curve (AUC) score of 98.37 per cent (CI: 97.36-99.38) was obtained under RFC. For the prediction of risk at two years, the maximum average accuracy score of 77.57 per cent (CI: 76.6-78.54) was achieved under X-G Boost followed by RFC (77.2%, CI: 76.15-78.25) and a maximum AUC of (85.82%, CI: 84.88-86.76) was obtained under RFC. Interpretation & conclusions In both the identification and prediction of hypertension, RFC was found to be better than the other classifiers. 'Waist circumference' followed by 'body mass index' (BMI) were found to have maximum relative importance in the identification of hypertension, while in the case of two-year risk prediction, the baseline 'systolic blood pressure' (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and 'BMI' had the maximum relative importance. The findings revealed the potential of predictive models in accurately identifying high-risk individuals, enabling timely interventions, and optimising clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.