Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40536303›Full record

ArticleLa Medicina del lavoro2025

Assessing Work Addiction: Validity of the Italian Version of the Work Addiction Risk Test.

Francesco Marcatto, Lisa Di Blas, Donatella Ferrante, Simone Festa, Ilaria Palomba, Francesca Larese Filon

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in La Medicina del lavoro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco MarcattoDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste.ORCID 0000-0003-0675-0876
Lisa Di BlasDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste.ORCID 0000-0002-1374-2535
Donatella FerranteDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste.ORCID 0000-0002-4304-5087
Simone FestaDepartment of International Human and Social Sciences, International University of Rome.
Ilaria PalombaDepartment of Education, Psychology and Communication, Suor Orsola Benincasa University, Naples.
Francesca Larese FilonClinical Unit of Occupational Medicine, University of Trieste.ORCID 0000-0002-7717-0417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWork addiction is a contemporary addiction affecting 8.3% to 22% of individuals in Europe, leading to detrimental effects on relationships, work-family balance, and overall well-being. Given its prevalence and impact, standardized assessment tools are crucial for distinguishing between work addiction and healthy work engagement.

methodsThis study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Work Addiction Risk Test (WART). A convenience sample of 700 workers from Northeastern and Southern Italy completed the Italian version of the WART  along with other well-being at work and personality measures.

resultsExploratory factor analysis revealed a five-factor structure of the WART, partially overlapping with the original version. Despite some weaknesses in the factor structure, the WART demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, including internal consistency and associations with organizational and personality correlates of work addiction.

conclusionsThe Italian version of the WART is a reliable tool for assessing work addiction risk among Italian workers. This tool can aid in identifying individuals at risk and facilitating early intervention and support. Future research should focus on further validating the factor structure and exploring the utility of the WART indifferent cultural and occupational contexts.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveAdultFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40536303
PMCPMC12199024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.