Trial reportClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Exposure-Response Relationships for Axatilimab in Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Axatilimab Immunogenicity and Clinical Relevance in Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Axatilimab, a high-affinity humanized monoclonal antibody that targets colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor, is approved for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Here, we describe the exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety in patients with cGVHD who received axatilimab. Exposure-efficacy relationships were assessed in treated patients in the AGAVE-201 study (n = 239); exposure-safety relationships were assessed in treated patients in AGAVE-201 (n = 239) and the phase 1/2 SNDX-6352-0503 study (n = 39). For binary or time-to-event endpoints, logistic or Cox regression analyses, respectively, were performed using axatilimab exposure metrics that were derived from a previously developed population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Overall response and ≥ 7-point improvement in modified Lee Symptom Scale responses were associated with axatilimab exposure, with lower axatilimab exposure increasing the odds of a response. Duration of response was not associated with axatilimab exposure. Ten of 11 safety endpoints were associated with axatilimab exposure, with higher axatilimab exposure increasing the odds of adverse events. Among the 3 regimens evaluated in AGAVE-201, the 0.3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (Q2W) regimen had the highest predicted probability of response. Additionally, this dose group had the lowest predicted probability of event occurrence across all 10 safety endpoints associated with exposure among the evaluated regimens. Despite body weight influencing axatilimab exposure by > 20%, its effect on efficacy and safety endpoints remained minimal, with a maximum difference of ≤ 0.4% and ≤ 4.4% between the 1st and 4th quartiles of body weight, respectively. Taken together, these findings support the benefit-risk profile of axatilimab 0.3 mg/kg Q2W in patients with cGVHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.