SynthesisInternational journal of language & communication disorders
The Role of Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) in International Stroke Teams: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent published guidelines suggest that speech and language therapists (SLTs) should be part of stroke teams, but their involvement and roles according to country income are unknown.
aimsThis review aims to (1) investigate the level of involvement of SLTs in acute stroke management, rehabilitation, and long-term care, and (2) examine whether the roles and contributions of SLTs in stroke care vary according to a country's income level.
methodsA systematic review methodology was conducted by an expert librarian and three independent researchers based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This systematic review was registered on the PROSPERO website. The search strategy involved using MESH Terms 'speech and language therapy' AND stroke AND team* across six databases as follows: MEDLINE Complete, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. The review was conducted using the Covidence software.
resultsOut of 1142 titles identified, 42 studies met the criteria: 34 studies (80%) were from high-income countries, five (12%) were from upper-middle-income countries, and three (8%) were from low-middle-income countries. No studies were published in low-income countries.
conclusionLack of SLTs reported in stroke and rehabilitation teams in low- and low-middle-income countries raises concern for patients' access to specialized SLT services. Healthcare policy should highlight the need for greater investment in SLT resources and the role of SLTs in managing aphasia, dysphagia, and chronic rehabilitation needs to improve patient outcomes. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Stroke is a leading cause of acquired disability with rehabilitation requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Speech and language therapists (SLTs) play a significant role in stroke care, addressing communication, swallowing, and cognitive disorders. Despite the recognized importance, SLTs' involvement in stroke care teams varies significantly across healthcare systems, especially in lower-income countries. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study reveals global discrepancies in SLT involvement in stroke care, with high-income countries benefiting from structured, specialized roles across all phases of rehabilitation, while low- and middle-income countries face ad hoc, limited involvement due to systemic changes. The findings highlight the need for standardized protocols and greater investment in SLT resources to ensure equitable stroke rehabilitation services worldwide. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The clinical implications of this study are as follows: (a) integrating SLTs in stroke teams, especially in underrepresented regions, is essential to improve rehabilitation outcomes, (b) advocacy efforts prioritize equal access to SLT services globally, supported by policy changes and education and (c) participatory research must involve patients as equal partners to address community-specific rehabilitation priorities as involving stroke survivors and caregivers in the design of rehabilitation services has been shown to identify local barriers to access and shape more culturally appropriate interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.