Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535985›Full record

ArticleHong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao2025

The feasibility of M-health for people with chronic low back pain in Shanghai, China: A qualitative study.

Waner Xie, Guojiong Hu, Yijin Wang, Xiaoquan Luo, Linrong Liao, Allan C L Fu, Jianhua Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Waner XieInstitute of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2265-9422
Guojiong HuInstitute of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6920-0967
Yijin WangDepartment of Physiotherapy, Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9259-7551
Xiaoquan LuoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4908-8045
Linrong LiaoThe First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7661-870X
Allan C L FuFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-2367
Jianhua LinDepartment of Physiotherapy, Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6842-9466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (M-health) has emerged as a promising solution for enhancing the management of low back pain. However, the feasibility of M-health among the Chinese population and its influencing factors remain unclear. Objective: This study aimed to assess the acceptance of M-health among people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and physiotherapists in Shanghai, China, and to explore the influencing factors of its utility in the treatment of CLBP. Methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 25 participants with CLBP and 20 physiotherapists, utilising a combination of group discussion and individual interview. Thematic analysis, supported by NVivo software, was employed to identify and examine the themes regarding the facilitators and barriers to the utility of M-health in Shanghai, China. Results: The focus group discussions revealed a broad spectrum of factors that drive or hinder participants' acceptance of M-health. Three main themes related to the feasibility of M-health were identified from the interviews: (1) Reasons for embracing M-health; (2) Reasons for resisting M-health; (3) Recommendations to enhance the feasibility of M-health. In general, participants exhibited enthusiasm towards the prospect of offering M-health as a viable treatment. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that the feasibility of M-health depends on many factors in Shanghai, China. Efforts to promote the establishment of M-health policy or laws, rational integration of M-health and face-to-face model and improvement of the functions of M-health applications may increase its feasibility in Shanghai, China.

Indexed as

feasibilityLow back painM-healthphysiotherapyrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40535985
PMCPMC12171769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.