ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Beta tACS of varying intensities differentially affect resting-state and movement-related sensorimotor power.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effects of High-Definition Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (HD-tACS) on Dual-Task Performance and Upper-Limb Multi-Joint Motor Control.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The potential of event-related beta oscillations as biomarkers for neuromodulatory treatment efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals who face difficulties with voluntary movement experience considerable challenges in performing everyday tasks, significantly compromising their sense of autonomy. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) holds promise in modulating sensorimotor beta oscillations, which underscore voluntary movement. However, the exact effect of beta tACS on oscillatory power is still largely elusive. This study aimed to examine the effect of different intensities of beta tACS (20 Hz) on both resting-state and event-related sensorimotor oscillations. Twenty-one healthy young adults (13 female; mean age 24.30 ± 4.84 years) received four separate 20 min sessions of tACS at different intensities (sham, 0.5 mA, 1.0 mA, or 1.5 mA, peak-to-peak), targeting the left primary motor cortex during rest. Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded before and after stimulation, during both resting state and a self-paced right index finger button press task. Changes in sensorimotor beta power (13-30 Hz) were analyzed. For the resting-state, none of the real stimulation intensities induced significant changes in beta power relative to sham. For event-related activity, we observed intensity-dependent changes in bilateral broadband power (4-90 Hz): during movement preparation, 1.0 mA stimulation increased power; during movement termination, 0.5 mA stimulation decreased power while 1.0 mA and 1.5 mA stimulation induced comparable increases in power. While none of the stimulation intensities induced changes in broadband power during movement execution, 1.0 mA stimulation shifted participants' peak beta frequency toward the tACS frequency. Interestingly, changes in power during movement preparation and execution following 1.0 mA stimulation were negatively associated with participants' pre-tACS peak beta frequency. Together, these findings contribute to our understanding of the sensorimotor response to beta tACS, as well as the effect of stimulation intensity on tACS-induced neuromodulation, which has important implications for research and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.