Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535944›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Wolf cranial morphology tracks population replacement in Fennoscandia.

Dominika Bujnáková, Jouni Aspi, Carsten Gundlach, Laura Kvist, Christy A Hipsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominika BujnákováEcology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8043-9897
Jouni AspiEcology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2451-3201
Carsten GundlachDepartment of Physics, NEXMAP, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2895-1882
Laura KvistEcology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2108-0172
Christy A HipsleyDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-9363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans have directly or indirectly contributed to the genetic and thus often phenotypic changes of many species. Anthropogenic pressures, such as persecution and hunting, have negatively affected wolf populations in northern Europe. In line with the genetic replacement that occurred during the twentieth century following the extirpation of wolves from Scandinavia (Norway and Sweden) and their near-extirpation from Finland, we provide evidence of morphological changes in wolf cranial morphology across these populations. Using three-dimensional landmark-based geometric morphometrics, we show that modern wolves in Scandinavia and Finland have, on average, crania with wider frontal bones, wider and higher positioned zygomatic arches and more ventral flexion of the rostrum compared to the historical wolf populations. Although both populations differ in the magnitude and direction of shape change over time, the centroid size or overall size of the cranium, is significantly larger only in the modern Scandinavian wolves. Different genetic origins of the historical and modern populations have probably played a role in the observed morphological variation; however, it is also likely that morphology has been affected by the availability of different prey, which has changed over time.

Indexed as

Canis lupusgeometric morphometricspopulation extirpationskull shape

Identifiers

PMID40535944
PMCPMC12173494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.