Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535922›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025

Increasing Resiliency in U.S. Air Force Personnel: A Multi-Site Trial Protocol.

Stephen H A Hernandez, Jacqueline Killian, Mark B Parshall, Tonya Y White, Enesha J Hicks, Victoria Hughes, Theresa A Bedford, Yiliang Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephen H A HernandezUniversity of New Mexico, College of Nursing, MSC07 4380, Box 9, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA.
Jacqueline KillianSchool of Nursing, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Mail Stop: 3018, 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA.
Mark B ParshallUniversity of New Mexico, College of Nursing, MSC07 4380, Box 9, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA.
Tonya Y White59 Medical Wing, Sciences and Technology, 1632 Nellis St., Bldg. 5406, JBSA-Lackland TX, 78236, USA.
Enesha J Hicks59 Medical Wing, Sciences and Technology, 1632 Nellis St., Bldg. 5406, JBSA-Lackland TX, 78236, USA.
Victoria HughesJohns Hopkins University, School of Nursing, 5525 N. Wolfe St., Room S419, Baltimore MD 21205, USA.
Theresa A Bedford88 Medical Group, Clinical Investigations, 4881 Sugar Maple Dr, Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH 45433, USA.
Yiliang ZhuUniversity of New Mexico, School of Medicine, MSC10 5550, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of the Stress Management and Resilience Training (SMART) in increasing the resilience of U.S. Air Force personnel. We aim to recruit up to 500 active component Air Force personnel and provide a two-arm randomization modality to make SMART more accessible and adaptive to the personnel's schedules. Two-arm randomization will be used to assign three sites for participants to choose in-person or computer-based training (CBT) and two sites where participants are randomized into their training type (in-person or CBT). The use of two-arm randomization will enable the examination of the difference between real-world settings within the framework of causal inference, as well as, differences based upon self-selection and a randomized control trial. We propose to examine the intervention effects at 12, 24 and 36-weeks post-intervention. Initial analysis will include descriptive statistics to characterize demographic status, military grade, duty location, and military occupation. The objectives of our analyses will include testing and estimating the intervention effects by comparing pre-post intervention changes in resilience, stress, anxiety, and QoL at each follow-up. Scores will also be pooled to test for overall intervention effects over time. Intervention effectiveness will be reported by comparing mean or median effects using 95 % confidence intervals and effect size estimates. An analysis of the longitudinal trend over the study period will be conducted by simultaneously examining data from all follow-ups using mixed-effects models in which random effects will be used to characterize between and within-subject variations.

Indexed as

Air forceMilitaryResilienceStress

Identifiers

PMID40535922
PMCPMC12174564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.