ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025
Increasing Resiliency in U.S. Air Force Personnel: A Multi-Site Trial Protocol.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex differences in physical performance, sleep, and psychological responses to long-term, arduous military training.Physiological reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of the Stress Management and Resilience Training (SMART) in increasing the resilience of U.S. Air Force personnel. We aim to recruit up to 500 active component Air Force personnel and provide a two-arm randomization modality to make SMART more accessible and adaptive to the personnel's schedules. Two-arm randomization will be used to assign three sites for participants to choose in-person or computer-based training (CBT) and two sites where participants are randomized into their training type (in-person or CBT). The use of two-arm randomization will enable the examination of the difference between real-world settings within the framework of causal inference, as well as, differences based upon self-selection and a randomized control trial. We propose to examine the intervention effects at 12, 24 and 36-weeks post-intervention. Initial analysis will include descriptive statistics to characterize demographic status, military grade, duty location, and military occupation. The objectives of our analyses will include testing and estimating the intervention effects by comparing pre-post intervention changes in resilience, stress, anxiety, and QoL at each follow-up. Scores will also be pooled to test for overall intervention effects over time. Intervention effectiveness will be reported by comparing mean or median effects using 95 % confidence intervals and effect size estimates. An analysis of the longitudinal trend over the study period will be conducted by simultaneously examining data from all follow-ups using mixed-effects models in which random effects will be used to characterize between and within-subject variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.