Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535904›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Zebrafish caudal fin model to investigate the role of Cissus quadrangularis, bioceramics, and tendon extracellular matrix scaffolds in bone regeneration.

S Balaji Ganesh, Fharreeha Fathima Anees, Gurumoorthy Kaarthikeyan, Taniya Mary Martin, Meenakshi Sundaram Kishore Kumar, M I Sheefaa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Exploring the Role ofOrthopedic research and reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Efficient Decolorization and Preparation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S Balaji GaneshDepartment of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Fharreeha Fathima AneesDepartment of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Gurumoorthy KaarthikeyanDepartment of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Taniya Mary MartinZebrafish Facility, Department of Anatomy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Meenakshi Sundaram Kishore KumarZebrafish Facility, Department of Anatomy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
M I SheefaaDepartment of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Periodontal bone regeneration faces several challenges such as incomplete bone-ligament-cementum restoration, unpredictable clinical outcomes and membrane exposure risks. The zebra fish caudal fin model of regeneration could be an excellent model system for mimicking the periodontal regenerative criteria and the present study aimed to explore the potential of innovative composite scaffolds characterized by Materials and methods: Zebrafish were subjected to caudal fin amputation, followed by the application of different scaffold groups. The fabricated scaffolds were then crosslinked using glutaraldehyde vapours and stored in a desiccator for future use. The scaffolds were classified into five groups: negative control, PERIO COL- GTR (G1), Results: The physical characterization showed the scaffold interaction by spectral differentiation between the groups. Among the groups, Test group 4 demonstrated superior regeneration with enhanced collagen deposition, reduced inflammatory response, and significantly higher growth compared to control. Conclusion: These findings suggested that group 4 scaffold significantly accelerates zebrafish fin regeneration, making these scaffolds promising candidates for periodontal tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.

Indexed as

CarrageenanCissus quadrangularisExtracellular matrixSilver hydroxyapatiteSilver tricalcium phosphateZebrafish fin regeneration

Identifiers

PMID40535904
PMCPMC12173733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.