ArticleJournal of Cancer2025
Pair-matched analysis of Circulating Melanoma Cells (CMCs) before and after Immunotherapy in Relation to other Melanoma-Specific Biomarkers.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The gut-skin axis in melanoma: from microbial regulatory mechanisms to clinical translation for precision management.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanoma remains challenging in terms of diagnosis and treatment, and there is an urgent need to implement accurate diagnostic methods and personalized treatment to improve clinical outcomes. Therefore, it may be useful to enrich the panel of melanoma markers already in use and develop combinations of biomarkers for disease prognosis and monitoring. Data suggest that a promising biomarker for such a combination is circulating melanoma cells (CMCs). Although the relevances of various biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring in melanoma have been extensively studied, we aimed at comprehensive investigation and comparison of liquid biopsy and tissue biomarkers with clinical status of the patient. Specifically, we focused on CMCs, by comparing the number of CMCs, including pre- and post-treatment. Furthermore, we have assessed the expression of the PMEL and Melan-A markers and the S100B and TIMP-1 protein levels in representative blood samples from melanoma patients and healthy controls. The number of CMCs in the study group was significantly higher than in the CMC-negative control group. However, there was no significant difference between the incidence of CMCs in the pre- and post-treatment blood draws. Nonetheless, we have observed a negative correlation between LDH levels and PFS, and a negative correlation between S100B levels and lymphocyte counts. The results of the study indicate that combinations of biomarkers, rather than any single biomarker alone, possess the highest clinical application potential, which urges further research on larger patient groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.