Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535776›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

What Motivates Intensive Care Nurses to Continue Working in the Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Study.

Camilla Leithe-Lajord, Kjersti Grønning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Camilla Leithe-LajordNord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger Hospital, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1831-9076
Kjersti GrønningNord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger Hospital, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4256-6339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to improve ICU capacity and working conditions in Norwegian hospitals and recruit and retain nurses. The aim of this study is to explore what motivates nurses to continue working in the ICU using a constructivist approach, asserting that knowledge is created through the interaction between the researcher, the participants, and the context. Eight individual semi-structured interviews with intensive care nurses were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. We identified one main overarching theme, "an interpersonal and professionally focussed work environment," highlighting how a supportive and professional atmosphere boosts intensive care nurses' job satisfaction and motivation, and three subthemes. The sub-themes were named: "unity and well-being," underscoring the need for professional and interpersonal support, "close and professional leadership," emphasising the importance of having an attentive, accessible, and unifying leader, and "professional engagement and mastery," focussing on the significance of training, continuous skill development, and task distribution based on competence and experience. This study adds new knowledge about environmental factors that contribute to the understanding of why intensive care nurses remain in their profession and their motivation to continue working in the ICU despite the high workload.

Indexed as

engagementintensive care nursesleadershipmotivationNorwaynurse retentionprofessional developmentprofessional focuswork environment

Identifiers

PMID40535776
PMCPMC12174790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.