ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2025
Effect of non-invasive neuroelectric stimulation of oral cavity for obstructive sleep apnoea: A systematic review.
Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of non-invasive neuroelectric stimulation of oral cavity for obstructive sleep apnoea: A systematic review.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: With an estimated disease burden of one billion adults aged 30-69, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) offers considerable challenges in terms of both identification and management Neuroelectric stimulation offers benefit with studies showing improvement in both the respiratory disturbance index and apnoea-hypopnoea index. This systematic review aims to examine the effects of non-invasive neuroelectric stimulation of the oral cavity utilized in the treatment of OSA. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, EBSCO Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source and Wiley Cochrane Library was utilized to identify articles. A total of 4 articles investigating 154 participants were included in the final synthesis. Data was extracted to by two authors (MOA and HI) working independently of each other. Any discrepancies that arose were discussed and resolved. Results: Our results demonstrated that non-invasive neurostimulation serves as an avenue for management that can allow for improvements in functionality as well as oxygen saturation amongst patients suffering from mild to moderate OSA. Conclusion: Due to the dearth of research, it is imperative that further studies are done to investigate the efficacy of neuromuscular stimulation, as these findings cannot be generalized across different populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.