Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535742›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2025

Development and validity of type II sulcus vocalis in excised canine larynx.

Ting Gong, Peng-Cheng Yu, Chao Xue, An-Rong Sun, Yi Zhang, Rui Fang, Bing-Hua Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Development and validity of type II sulcus vocalis in excised canine larynx.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ting GongSchool of Rehabilitation Science Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Shanghai China.ORCID 0000-0001-7553-5649
Peng-Cheng YuENT institute and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China.
Chao XueENT institute and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China.
An-Rong SunENT institute and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China.
Yi ZhangENT institute and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China.
Rui FangENT institute and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China.
Bing-Hua ZhuDepartment of Emergency & Intensive Care Unit Shuguang Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Shanghai China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to develop a sulcus vocalis model in the excised canine larynx and to investigate the validity of the model. Methods: Type II sulcus vocalis was created by continuous intradermal suture in six excised canine larynges. We investigated the validity of the model based on phonatory (aerodynamic and acoustic) measures, laryngeal videostroboscopy (LVS), and histological examination. The aeroacoustic parameters included phonation threshold pressure (PTP), fundamental frequency ( Results: In all the experimental specimens, there were significant increases in the PTP ([6.61 ± 1.66] cm H Conclusions: Type Ⅱ sulcus vocalis was successfully created in excised canine larynx. The aeroacoustic and LVS analysis of this model resembled the characteristics of patients with sulcus vocalis. The model could be helpful to elucidate the pathology of the phonation, and evaluate and compare the treatments for sulcus vocalis.

Indexed as

animal modelcanineexcised larynxsulcus vocalisvocal folds

Identifiers

PMID40535742
PMCPMC12172118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.