ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2025
Phenotypic differences in airway obstruction as determined by VOTE score.
Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phenotypic differences in airway obstruction as determined by VOTE score.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective if this study was to investigate phenotypic differences in airway obstruction, as determined by VOTE score, in a cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). Methods: Patients older than 18 years of age scheduled for DISE by one surgeon at a tertiary care center from July 2016 to July 2022 were included in a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and VOTE scores were extracted. Spearman correlation tests were utilized to determine the relationship between variables, and statistical analyses were performed using R. Results: The study included 165 patients (61.24 years, SD 11.57; BMI 31.04 kg/m Conclusions: Patients suffering from OSA may be categorized into one of two distinct phenotypes of clinical significance. Phenotype 1 patients who are nonobese and have less significant obstruction overall, with increased obstruction at the tongue, may benefit greatly from targeted surgical modalities. Conversely, phenotype 2 patients with worse obstruction on DISE and increased velum and oropharynx obstruction may represent a phenotype of OSA that is increasingly difficult to treat surgically, due to body habitus and severe, multi-level obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.