ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025
Inequities in Canadian maternal-child healthcare are perpetuating the intergenerational effects of colonization for indigenous women and children.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perinatal Health Promotion in Indigenous Maternal Health: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Evidence and Australian Community-Controlled Programs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Child Development Interventions Among Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pregnancy as a journey of care and connection: Indigenous women's experiences navigating health systems and community support.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Reciprocity in global health: How successes from the global south can inform global health interventions in Canada and the U.S.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Universal, publicly funded healthcare has long been a point of pride for Canada, despite decades of data contradicting its universality and accessibility. Inequities in access to and provision of healthcare services are particularly evident in the direct comparison of health outcomes between Indigenous (First Nations, Inuit, and Métis) and non-Indigenous populations in Canada. Globally, there are data to support similar disparities in maternal-child health for Indigenous populations around the world. Here, we describe how these inequities uniquely impact people at the intersection of multiple vulnerabilities-Indigenous pregnant women and their children. Indigenous pregnant women in Canada are far more likely to have experienced harmful
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.