ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Reliability of remote at-home oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in community-dwelling children aged 3-17.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Telemedicine in Pediatric Cardiology: Current Applications, Clinical Impact, and Future Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: As hypertension becomes more prevalent, remote assessment of blood pressure (BP) has been proposed as a method to improve BP management in the pediatric population. We investigated the reliability of at-home BP monitoring in children ages 3-17. Methods: This study was conducted at six sites across the United States. Children participated in three BP measurements on one occasion by caregivers at home and, on another separate occasion, by trained examiners in a clinic setting. The results were averaged and classified according to the 2017 Pediatric Hypertension Guidelines as normal BP, elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 hypertension. We collapsed participants with elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 hypertension into one group: above-normal. We examined the agreement between the caregivers' and examiners' BP readings and the ease of the measurement process. Results: One hundred eighteen (118) children participated in this study (48.3% male; mean age 9.65 ± 4.52 years). Most caregivers (78%-93%) and examiners (88%-99%) rated elements of BP measurement as "easy" or "very easy". Caregiver and examiners' agreement on BP classification as normal or above-normal ranged from 75.00% to 90.16% across age groups. Caregiver and examiner BP concordance significantly differed by age group ( Conclusions: Overall, most aspects of the remote BP measurement process were rated as easy, suggesting that remote monitoring of BP in children is feasible. Concordance of BP measurements by caregivers and examiners was high for children in the normal BP range. More research is needed on the reliability of home BP monitoring across the pediatric age range for those with above-normal BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.