ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Safety and efficacy of rescue endovascular treatment in ischemic stroke patients with early neurological deterioration caused by large vessel occlusion.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endovascular treatment and clinical outcomes in minor ischemic stroke due to large-vessel disease: a retrospective study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe optimal treatment after deterioration following ischemic stroke has not been established in the current guidelines. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy of rescue endovascular treatment in patients with early neurological deterioration after acute ischemic stroke.
methodsThis study analyzed data retrospectively retrieved from the electronic medical records at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University.
resultsA total of 20 patients were included in the rescue endovascular treatment group and 23 in the medical group. The 90-day favorable outcome rate in the rescue endovascular treatment group was significantly better than that of the medical group (75.0%
conclusionRescue endovascular treatment is effective and safe for patients with ischemic stroke and deterioration due to large vessel occlusion, leading to no significant increase in the risk of hemorrhage or death even when the time window exceeds 24 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.