Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535595›Full record

ArticlePHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025

Ranee K Anderson, Shijie Qin, Rachel M Carson, Sam R Nugen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ranee K AndersonDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Shijie QinDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Rachel M CarsonDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Sam R NugenDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3638-1776

Funding

Accelerating phage evolution and tools via synthetic biology and machine learningR01EB027895 · NIBIB · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI NUGEN, SAM R · 2019 to 2024
$2.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Genomic sequencing and annotation, morphological characterization, and host range analyses of bacteriophage (phage) isolates are crucial to understanding each phage's unique set of properties and how they can be utilized as effective tools in medicine, environmental monitoring, biotechnology, and agriculture. In this study, we present the fully annotated genome of viral isolate Materials and Methods: Whole genome sequencing, Results: NRG-P0073 was found to have a 170,913 bp genome, coding for 10 tRNAs, 14 terminators, 259 genes, 249 coding sequences, and a GC content of 35.5%. Double-agar spot tests revealed that NRG-P0073 could adsorb 33 of the 72 strains (45.8%), but only 15 of the 72 strains (20.8%) could complete replication to form distinguishable plaques. All nine of the Conclusions: This study presents novel and complete genomic data, characterization, and host range analyses for the newly characterized phage NRG-P0073. Further characterization and analysis are required, including the identification of the

Indexed as

bacteriophageECOR libraryGe15host rangeKeio collectionNRG-P0073phage

Identifiers

PMID40535595
PMCPMC12172643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.