Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535592›Full record

ReviewFood chemistry: X2025

Advancements and obstacles in acrylamide detection and mitigation in food products.

Ancuţa-Veronica Lupăescu, Mircea Oroian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ancuţa-Veronica LupăescuFaculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, "Ştefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, 13th University Street, Suceava 720229, Romania.
Mircea OroianFaculty of Food Engineering, "Ştefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, 13th University Street, Suceava 720229, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acrylamide, a water-soluble compound formed naturally in foods during high-temperature cooking, poses significant health risks due to its carcinogenic and neurotoxic effects. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of advanced detection methods and mitigation strategies, underscoring how detection sensitivity influences the evaluation and optimization of acrylamide reduction strategies. Advanced chromatographic techniques, such as LC-MS/MS and GC-MS, enable trace-level quantification of acrylamide and serve as essential tools for validating the efficacy of mitigation strategies, including enzymatic, fermentation-based, and antioxidant treatments. Additionally, emerging biotechnological approaches, including engineered enzymes, probiotic detoxification, and nanostructured hydrocolloid systems, are discussed for their potential to minimize acrylamide while preserving sensory attributes. Limitations in current methodologies, including variability across food matrices and scalability challenges, are critically assessed. This study highlights recent progress in chromatographic methods for acrylamide detection and explores mitigation strategies to reduce its levels in heat-treated foods, emphasizing the importance of continued research in food safety.

Indexed as

AcrylamideChromatographyFoodMitigation strategies

Identifiers

PMID40535592
PMCPMC12173749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.