ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Encapsulation of lutein in nanoemulsions: Comparative evaluation of chickpea and soy protein isolates on physicochemical stability, antioxidant activity, and rheological properties.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-Assisted Covalent Conjugation of Walnut Albumin with Bound Polyphenols: Structural Modulation and Functional Enhancement.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structural characterization and bioaccessibility of nanoliposomal lutein from pumpkin extract.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in Sustainable Lutein Production: Sources, Technologies, and Functional Applications.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ultrasonic-Assisted Fabrication and Stability Evaluation of Pepper Seed Protein Nanoemulsions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoemulsions have emerged as advanced systems for encapsulating bioactive compounds, offering enhanced stability, bioavailability, and functionality in various applications. This study evaluates the potential of chickpea protein isolate (CPI) and soy protein isolate (SPI) as emulsifiers in the preparation and stabilization of lutein-loaded nanoemulsions. The study looked at CPI and SPI and how each of them interacted with the physical and chemical properties, antioxidant activity, and stability of proteins at different concentration levels (1 %, 3 %, and 5 %). The data showed that CPI was better than SPI in terms of equal sizing, zeta potential, and long-term stability. Nanoemulsions made using 3 % CPI gave the best results showing optimal particle size, antioxidant retention, and rheological stability. CPI-stabilized emulsions, which were the result of strong thixotropic behavior higher hysteresis loop areas and more robust hydrogen bonding and cohesive interfacial layer, were the better products. In contrast, SPI-stabilized emulsions were less efficient because of their reliance on hydrophobic interactions. In addition, lutein encapsulation was a mean to increase the stability of emulsions and also to boost up the antioxidant efficiency against blank formulations. The results show the excellent emulsifying capabilities of CPI and the application of bioactive ingredients in functional foods and nutraceuticals that benefit the bioavailability and function of lutein. The findings can pave the way for the utilization of plant-based proteins for eco-friendly nanoemulsion technologies to be used in bioactive delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.