Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535591›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2025

Encapsulation of lutein in nanoemulsions: Comparative evaluation of chickpea and soy protein isolates on physicochemical stability, antioxidant activity, and rheological properties.

Farhang Hameed Awlqadr, Babak Ghanbarzadeh, Ammar B Altemimi, Khaled Arab, Saeed Dadashi, Akram Pezeshki, Mohammad Ali Hesarinejad, Tarek Gamal Abedelmaksoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Farhang Hameed AwlqadrFood Science and Quality Control, Halabja Technical College, Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.
Babak GhanbarzadehDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Iran.
Ammar B AltemimiDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Basrah 61004, Iraq.
Khaled ArabDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Iran.
Saeed DadashiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Iran.
Akram PezeshkiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad Ali HesarinejadDepartment of Food Sensory and Cognitive Science, Research Institute of Food Science and Technology (RIFST), Mashhad, Iran.
Tarek Gamal AbedelmaksoudFood Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoemulsions have emerged as advanced systems for encapsulating bioactive compounds, offering enhanced stability, bioavailability, and functionality in various applications. This study evaluates the potential of chickpea protein isolate (CPI) and soy protein isolate (SPI) as emulsifiers in the preparation and stabilization of lutein-loaded nanoemulsions. The study looked at CPI and SPI and how each of them interacted with the physical and chemical properties, antioxidant activity, and stability of proteins at different concentration levels (1 %, 3 %, and 5 %). The data showed that CPI was better than SPI in terms of equal sizing, zeta potential, and long-term stability. Nanoemulsions made using 3 % CPI gave the best results showing optimal particle size, antioxidant retention, and rheological stability. CPI-stabilized emulsions, which were the result of strong thixotropic behavior higher hysteresis loop areas and more robust hydrogen bonding and cohesive interfacial layer, were the better products. In contrast, SPI-stabilized emulsions were less efficient because of their reliance on hydrophobic interactions. In addition, lutein encapsulation was a mean to increase the stability of emulsions and also to boost up the antioxidant efficiency against blank formulations. The results show the excellent emulsifying capabilities of CPI and the application of bioactive ingredients in functional foods and nutraceuticals that benefit the bioavailability and function of lutein. The findings can pave the way for the utilization of plant-based proteins for eco-friendly nanoemulsion technologies to be used in bioactive delivery.

Indexed as

BioavailabilityChickpea protein isolate (CPI)Encapsulation efficiencyLutein nanoemulsionRheological stabilitySoy protein isolate (SPI)

Identifiers

PMID40535591
PMCPMC12173706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.