ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Identifying a prognostic signature for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: the convergence of single-cell and bulk sequencing with machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- TIGD6 in gastric cancer: exploring its prognostic value and therapeutic potential through molecular and clinical investigations.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a highly aggressive renal cancer subtype and lacks highly precise individualized treatment options. Thus, we used a novel computational framework to construct a consensus machine learning-related signature (MLRS) to predict prognosis and screen patients effectively for immunotherapy. Methods: An integrative machine learning procedure involving 10 methods was used to contract MLRS. Various methods were used to evaluate immune cell infiltration and biological characteristics. Moreover, we explored the response to immunotherapy and drug sensitivity. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis, qRT-PCR, and a CCK-8 assay were used to clarify the biological functions of the hub gene. Results: MLRS demonstrated outstanding performance in predicting prognosis compared with the other published signatures, and the high-MLRS group had a favorable outcome in four independent datasets. Furthermore, the low-MLRS group displayed a greater possibility of responding to immunotherapy and had a "hot" tumor immunophenotype. The high-MLRS group was characterized by a phenotype of immune suppression and was less likely to benefit from immunotherapy, while some small molecule inhibitors might serve as promising treatment options. Single-cell analysis revealed that MLRS was highly enriched in endothelial cells. We also identified DLL4/Notch and JAG/Notch signaling as the key ligand-receptor pairs in ccRCC. EMCN was downregulated in ccRCC, and further functional experiments demonstrated that EMCN knockdown inhibited cell proliferation. Conclusion: The MLRS can predict patient prognosis, may be utilized to screen potential populations that may benefit from immunotherapy, and predict potential drug targets, with broad significance for the clinical treatment of ccRCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.