ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Assessment of synthetic post-therapeutic OCT images using the generative adversarial network in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal reasoning agent for enhanced ophthalmic decision-making: a preliminary real-world clinical validation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study is to generate post-therapeutic optical coherence tomography (OCT) images based on pre-therapeutic OCT by using generative adversarial networks (GANs). The synthetic images enable us to predict the short-term therapeutic efficacy of intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients. Methods: The study involved patients with RVO who received intravitreal anti-VEGF injection from 1 November 2018 to 30 November 2019. The OCT images taken before and shortly after treatment, with an interval of 4-8 weeks, were collected and randomly divided into the training set and test set at a ratio of approximately 3:1. The model is constructed based on the pix2pixHD algorithm, and synthetic OCT images are evaluated in terms of the picture quality, authenticity, the central retinal thickness (CRT), the maximal retinal thickness, the area of intraretinal cystoid fluid (IRC), and the area of subretinal fluid (SRF). Three supporting models, namely, the macular detection model, retinal stratification model, and lesion detection model, were constructed. Segmentation of macular location, retinal structure, and typical lesions were added to the input information. After verifying their accuracy, supporting models were used to detect the CRT, the maximal retinal thickness, IRC area, and SRF area of synthetic OCT images. The output predictive values are compared with real data according to the annotation on the real post-therapeutic OCT images. Results: A total of 1,140 pairs of pre- and post-therapeutic OCT images obtained from 95 RVO eyes were included in the study, and 374 images were annotated. Of the synthetic images, 88% were considered to be qualified. The accuracy of discrimination of real versus synthetic OCT images was 0.56 and 0.44 for two retinal specialists, respectively. The accuracy to predict the treatment efficacy of CRT, the maximal retinal thickness, IRC area, and SRF area was 0.70, 0.70, 0.92, and 0.78, respectively. Conclusion: Our study proves that the GAN is a reliable tool to predict the therapeutic efficacy of anti-VEGF injections in RVO patients. Evaluations conducted both qualitatively and quantitatively indicated that our model can generate high-quality post-therapeutic OCT images. Consequently, it has great potential in predicting the treatment efficacy and providing guidance to clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.