ArticleHRB open research2024
Healthcare and recreational sector collaboration strategies to support community-based physical activity participation among young people with childhood-onset physical disability: A scoping review protocol.
Article in HRB open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collaborative practice to support community-based physical activity for young people with childhood-onset physical disability: A scoping review.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Article
- Gym entry fees act as a barrier to exercising in community gyms for young adults with disability: A mixed methods study.JSAMS plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to identify evidence of collaboration between healthcare and recreational sectors aimed at supporting community-based physical activity participation among young people with childhood-onset physical disability. Introduction: Most young people with physical disabilities do insufficient physical activity, significantly impacting their future health. There have been long outstanding calls for collaboration between healthcare and recreational professionals to support physical activity participation for people with disabilities. Given the importance of physical activity and the roles of health and recreational professionals, there is a need to systematically identify evidence on collaborative strategies between sectors, describe the experiences of all individuals involved in delivering and receiving these collaborations and describe any outcomes measured as part of implementing these strategies. Inclusion criteria: This review will include studies that involve healthcare professionals and recreational professionals working together to support community based physical activity. Specifically aimed young people aged 10 to 24 years with childhood-onset physical disabilities. Studies that report the experiences of individuals in delivering and receiving these collaborations will be included as well as studies that describe an evaluation of collaborative strategies. Methods: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology of scoping reviews. A comprehensive search strategy will be developed in consultation with an information specialist. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus. The review will consider studies of any design that address collaboration between health and recreation sectors including qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods study designs. Two reviewers will independently screen each retrieved title and abstract and assess full-text articles against the inclusion criteria to determine eligibility. Data will be extracted and synthesized quantitively and qualitatively and mapped to a relevant framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.