ArticleHealth science reports2025
Nursing Errors in Iranian Nurses: A Mixed Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anesthesi̇a students' behavi̇ors towards a medi̇cal errors: a phenomenologi̇cal quali̇tati̇ve scenari̇o study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Medical errors that result in patient injuries and fatalities are a significant concern in healthcare. Understanding these errors and their contributing factors is essential for enhancing the quality of patient care. This study aimed to investigate nursing errors and the factors that influence them. Methods: This study employed a mixed-method approach with a sequential explanatory design and was conducted in Iran from 2022 to 2023. The study consisted of two phases. In the quantitative phase, a cross-sectional study was conducted in which 200 nurses in Kerman City completed two questionnaires: one on nursing errors and the other on factors influencing nursing errors. In the qualitative phase, the researchers conducted semi-structured, in-depth, face-to-face individual interviews with 30 nurses. Results: Two hundred nurses took part in the quantitative phase, and 99% of them reported experiencing at least one nursing error. The highest average score for errors was associated with medication errors (3.40 ± 0.37), followed by care errors (2.85 ± 1.34). The average scores for the most prevalent causes of errors were highest in the organizational dimension (3.8 ± 1.01). A significant positive correlation was found between the average scores of various error dimensions and the average scores of different dimensions related to the causes of errors ( Conclusion: The study revealed a high prevalence of nursing errors, emphasizing the need for proactive measures. Healthcare system managers and decision-makers must take into account the factors that contribute to nursing errors and respond appropriately to eliminate or reduce them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.