Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535504›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of transplantation2025

Prevalence and risk of progression of pancreatic cystic lesions in immunosuppressed patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maximilian Kießler, Helmut Friess, Volker Assfalg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maximilian KießlerDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München 81675, Germany. maximilian.kiessler@tum.de.
Helmut FriessDepartment of Surgery, Technische Universität München, München 81675, Germany.
Volker AssfalgDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München 81675, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic cystic lesions are common in patients eligible for solid organ transplantation. It has been shown that the need for immunosuppression after organ transplantation increases the rate of malignancies in organ recipients. However, the impact of immunosuppression on pancreatic cystic lesions is yet unknown.

aimTo evaluate the prevalence of pancreatic cystic lesions and the risk of cyst progression in immunosuppressed patients.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed in relevant databases. Studies reporting either on the prevalence and/or the incidence of pancreatic cyst progression compared to a control group were implemented in the first systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic.

resultsThe prevalence of pancreatic cystic lesions was comparable with 7% (95%CI: 5%-11%) in the immunosuppressed cohort and 9% (95%CI: 5%-16%) in the control cohort. The mean cyst size increase in the immunosuppression group was 3.2 mm (range 1.0-5.2mm) compared to 3.5 mm (1.0-6.9) in the control group (standardized mean difference 0.0 mm, 95%CI: -0.3-0.2 mm,

conclusionImmunosuppression does not increase the prevalence of pancreatic cystic lesions, nor does it increase the risk of cyst progression in terms of cyst size and development of resection criteria. Therefore, pancreatic cystic lesions in transplant candidates should not be a contraindication for solid organ transplantation.

Indexed as

ImmunosuppressionIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmOrgan transplantationPancreatic cystic lesionsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40535504
PMCPMC11886309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.