ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2025
Donor-specific antibodies against HLA-C, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ and their implications in kidney transplantation.
Review in World journal of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A case of overcoming De Novo thrombotic microangiopathy associated with hyperacute rejection in a living donor ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation despite severe intraoperative graft injury.CEN case reports · 2026Article
- Effect of preexisting human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies especially human leukocyte antigen-DQ on kidney transplant outcome.Frontiers in nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HLA-C, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ are thought to be benign due to low expression and few initial negative studies. Historically, most allocation programs used HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR antigens for matching. With the advent and use of single-bead antigen assays, more was learned about donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against these antigens. Interest in these antigens and antibodies grew when cases of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), mixed rejections, chronic AMR, and reduced graft survival were reported with DSAs against these antigens. Although the deleterious effects of these DSAs are more pronounced in retransplants, harmful effects have also been observed in first-time recipients. DSAs against each of these antigens can trigger rejection alone. Their combination with DSAs against HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR can cause more damage. It has been shown that strategies that reduce mismatches for these antigen lead to fewer rejections and better graft survival. There is a need for greater consensus on the universal typing of these antigens prior to transplantation for better patient and graft outcomes. This review focuses on the interaction of these antigens with lymphocytes and killer immunoglobulin receptors, arguments for not typing them, detailed analyses of the literature about their harmful effects, potential strategies moving forward, and recommendations for the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.