ArticleWorld journal of transplantation2025
Changes in the liver transplant evaluation process during the early COVID-19 era and the role of telehealth.
Article in World journal of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advantages and future outlooks in the use of telemedicine in liver transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupted healthcare and led to increased telehealth use. We explored the impact of COVID-19 on liver transplant evaluation (LTE).
aimTo understand the impact of telehealth on LTE during COVID-19 and to identify disparities in outcomes disaggregated by sociodemographic factors.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients who initiated LTE at our center from 3/16/20-3/16/21 ("COVID-19 era") and the year prior (3/16/19-3/15/20, "pre-COVID-19 era"). We compared LTE duration times between eras and explored the effects of telehealth and inpatient evaluations on LTE duration, listing, and pre-transplant mortality.
resultsOne hundred and seventy-eight patients were included in the pre-COVID-19 era cohort and one hundred and ninety-nine in the COVID-19 era cohort. Twenty-nine percent (58/199) of COVID-19 era initial LTE were telehealth, compared to 0% (0/178) pre-COVID-19. There were more inpatient evaluations during COVID-19 era (40%
conclusionCOVID-19 demonstrates a shift to telehealth and inpatient LTE. Telehealth does not impact LTE or listing duration, likelihood of listing, or mortality, suggesting telehealth may facilitate LTE without negative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.