Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535477›Full record

ArticleAutonomous intelligent systems2025

A hybrid Bi-LSTM model for data-driven maintenance planning.

Alexandros Noussis, Ryan O'Neil, Ahmed Saif, Abdelhakim Khatab, Claver Diallo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autonomous intelligent systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandros NoussisDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-0067-690X
Ryan O'NeilDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
Ahmed SaifDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
Abdelhakim KhatabLaboratory of Computer Engineering (LGIPM), Lorraine University, Metz, France.
Claver DialloDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern industries dependent on reliable asset operation under constrained resources employ intelligent maintenance methods to maximize efficiency. However, classical maintenance methods rely on assumed lifetime distributions and suffer from estimation errors and computational complexity. The advent of Industry 4.0 has increased the use of sensors for monitoring systems, while deep learning (DL) models have allowed for accurate system health predictions, enabling data-driven maintenance planning. Most intelligent maintenance literature has used DL models solely for remaining useful life (RUL) point predictions, and a substantial gap exists in further using predictions to inform maintenance plan optimization. The few existing studies that have attempted to bridge this gap suffer from having used simple system configurations and non-scalable models. Hence, this paper develops a hybrid DL model using Monte Carlo dropout to generate RUL predictions which are used to construct empirical system reliability functions used for the optimization of the selective maintenance problem (SMP). The proposed framework is used to plan maintenance for a mission-oriented series k-out-of-n:G system. Numerical experiments compare the framework's performance against prior SMP methods and highlight its strengths. When minimizing cost, maintenance plans are frequently produced that result in mission survival while avoiding unnecessary repairs. The proposed method is usable in large-scale, complex scenarios and various industrial contexts. The method finds exact solutions while avoiding the need for computationally-intensive parametric reliability functions.

Indexed as

Deep learningReliability and maintenance optimizationSelective maintenanceSystem prognostics

Identifiers

PMID40535477
PMCPMC12175739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.