Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40535455›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Tensions experienced by student and care professionals in a learning and innovation network: a responsive evaluation using storytelling.

M Marjolein Albers, R J J Robbert Gobbens, M Margreet Reitsma, H L G R Henk Nies, O A A M J Olaf Timmermans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Marjolein AlbersFaculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Apllied Sciences, De Boelelaan 1109 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
R J J Robbert GobbensFaculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Apllied Sciences, De Boelelaan 1109 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M Margreet ReitsmaVilans, National Centre of Expertise for Long-term Care, Churchilllaan 11 3527, GV, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
H L G R Henk NiesDepartment of Organization Sciences, Faculty Social Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
O A A M J Olaf TimmermansFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Learning and innovation networks are collaborative initiatives between educational and healthcare institutions aimed at integrating the learning of students and care professionals and improving the quality of care through shared practices. Aim: This study aims to explore how care professionals and students experience learning and working within a learning and innovation network. Methods: Using a responsive evaluation, we collected data in four iterative phases: (1) interviews with four students and two care professionals to identify themes; (2) development of four fictional stories illustrating tensions based on interview data and practical experience; (3) focus groups with students and care professionals to validate and refine the stories; and (4) a mixed stakeholder group discussion to reflect and start to formulate improvement actions. Thematic analysis was used across all phases. Results: Participants experienced various tensions, and one of the primary challenges for both students and care professionals was to balance the time allocated between learning activities, care provision and innovation projects. Students faced role ambiguity when performing unsupervised care tasks, feeling part of the team but also vulnerable in their learner status. Care professionals struggled with time constraints and competing demands between patient care and student supervision, which sometimes led to them withdrawing from guiding students. Another tension emerged around engaging in quality improvement. While participants recognized the importance of improving care, engaging in this progress was hindered by a lack of shared understanding of optimal rehabilitation practices and unclear responsibilities regarding implementing innovation. The student-dense environment, though rich in learning potential, heightened these tensions due to differing expectations and unclear roles. Conclusion: Although learning and innovation networks offer valuable opportunities for mutual learning and improving care, they also introduce tensions that need to be acknowledged and addressed. Managing these tensions, especially around time division, role clarity and a shared vision for improving care, is essential for creating sustainable learning and innovation climates in practice.

Indexed as

Geriatric rehabilitationHealthcare innovationNursing educationQualitative researchQuality improvementRole ambiguity

Identifiers

PMID40535455
PMCPMC12173126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.