ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The effect of maternal high-risk fertility behavior on child nutritional status in Sub-Saharan Africa: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Community-driven strategies for preventing childhood stunting: perspectives from parents and front-line workers in Rwanda.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Enhancing birth weight outcomes through improved antenatal care in West African countries: Evidence from propensity score matching analysis.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Maternal high-risk fertility behaviors (HRFBs) represent a multifaceted bio-demographic factor with profound implications for child health. Maternal HRFBs raise the risk of undernutrition in children under the age of five, rendering them more susceptible to stunting and wasting. When estimating the impact of HRFBs on child malnutrition using an observational study such as the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), it's important to consider the potential for selection bias and the effect of confounding variables. To address this, we employed propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis to more accurately estimate the true impact of maternal HRFBs on children's nutritional status. Methods: Secondary data analysis of 161,179 children under the age of five was conducted based on the 26 Sub-Saharan Africa DHS data (2015-2023). To estimate the maternal HRFBs on children's nutritional status, We employed propensity score matching (PSM) with a logistic model using the 'psmatch2 ate' STATA command to estimate the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) for the population, the treated group (ATT), and the untreated group (ATU). We assessed the quality of matching both statistically and graphically. Additionally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of the PSM estimates, using the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test statistic. Results: More than two-thirds of (57.14, 95%CI: 56.90, 57.39) mothers had a high-risk fertility behavior. In SSA the prevalence of stunting, wasting, and being underweight among under-five children was 30.58% (95%CI: 76.30, 76.72), 6.74% (95%CI: 6.62, 6.86) and 16.70% (95%CI: 16.52, 16.88), respectively. The difference in the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) of maternal HRFBs on stunting, wasting, and underweight was 2.00, 0.30, and 2.19%, respectively. The Average Treatment Effect on the Treated group (ATT) showed a 2.12% increased risk of stunting, a 0.24% decreased risk of wasting, and a 2.68% increased risk of underweight. These estimates remained robust to hidden bias and demonstrated good matching quality. Conclusion: These results indicate the necessity of public health interventions aimed at enhancing maternal and child health by promoting family planning services, educating young mothers, and providing support to women with high parity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.